FROM A DEBATE ”PROS AND CONS NEWBORN CIRCUMCISION”
In About.com Judaism: Read more explanations…
In connection with human rights, what then to say for vaccination?
It is also an intervention, which modulates and at least partially
erodes child's immune integrity.
In my opinion, after full 4 decades of clinical observation of human
trichomoniasis, circumcision is practice which mostly disables
trichomonas colonization with its strong capacity to cause
fibrosis/phymosis, as scientifically has proved BM Honigberg on
experimental animals a half century ago (1961).
The foreskin that is removing is very rich, perhaps the richest in the
whole body, with the special epithelial L cells, highly potent
part of immune apparatus. If challenged by infection, they evoke
antitrihomonas circulating immunity in highest
quantity level, capable of inducing strong local immunity
(resulting in very rarely establishing infection) and destruction
of extraurogenital trichomonads (non-STI) in their typical and atypical
locations, causing autoimmune-like syndroms.
This means, the removing hyperreactive part of the immune apparatus in
the foreskin, calms or reduces reactivity of extraurogenital
organs, if already colonized and sensitized by the extraurogenital
trichomonads, which are considered as symbionts in very different
From this immunobiological point of view, circumcision in the end of
first postpartal week, preferable 8th day after very stressful birth
and child immunity restoring and advanced separation of foreskin
from the glans caused by child´s spontaneous early morning
erections, It is the best timing, also because of very similar
immunogenic batteries of pulmo specific pseudocystic,leukocytoid
Trichomonads and Pneumocystis, airborne transmissible respiratory
parent´s microbe with similar, if not even identical immune